Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:25:46 -0800 | From | "David S. Miller" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Re: test11-pre5 |
| |
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 02:25:38 +0200 (IST) From: Dan Aloni <karrde@callisto.yi.org>
Agreed. BTW, after grepping for IFNAMSIZ references I've noticed some architectures (sparc64, mips64) define IFNAMSIZ for themsleves, for example, arch/sparc64/kernel/ioctl32.c, which defines it to 16, the same include/linux/if.h does. But if they are not the same?
Then the compiler will start warning us :-)
#define FOO 6 #define FOO 6 int main(void) { return FOO; } ? gcc -Wall -o test test.c ? #define FOO 6 #define FOO 7 int main(void) { return FOO; } ? gcc -Wall -o test test.c test.c:2: warning: `FOO' redefined test.c:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition ?
Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |