[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux-2.4.0-test10
    On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

    > > for microcode update as family=6? The manuals suggest that test for ">" is
    > > correct, i.e. that Intel will maintain compatibility with P6 wrt microcode
    > > update.
    > >
    > > Perhaps Richard can clarify this?
    > Until we know what the preventium IV does on microcode behaviour it seems
    > wisest to test for == not >.

    Ok, true, I agree with both you and Mikael Pettersson. Also, I couldn't
    find where in the volumeIII I saw references to ">", perhaps it wasn't in
    the docs but just in some sample Intel implementation (or maybe not).


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.023 / U:5.912 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site