[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux-2.4.0-test10
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > for microcode update as family=6? The manuals suggest that test for ">" is
> > correct, i.e. that Intel will maintain compatibility with P6 wrt microcode
> > update.
> >
> > Perhaps Richard can clarify this?
> Until we know what the preventium IV does on microcode behaviour it seems
> wisest to test for == not >.

Ok, true, I agree with both you and Mikael Pettersson. Also, I couldn't
find where in the volumeIII I saw references to ">", perhaps it wasn't in
the docs but just in some sample Intel implementation (or maybe not).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.047 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site