lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 03:29:15PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Please get your facts straight.
>
> The rest of this thread will show you that this is not a "Red Hat
> thing". Connectiva, Mandrake, and others do the same thing. In fact
> we choose the name "kgcc" to match the convention set by these other
> distributions.

So other distro's did it too. Why did nobody complain till RedHat
did it? Because no one else decided to use, as the default, a bleeding edge
compiler that not only won't compile the kernel but won't even touch a lot of
userspace code either.

--
Nathan Paul Simons, Junior Software Engineer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.250 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site