[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?
    Alan Cox wrote:
    > J. A. Magallon wrote:
    > > I have noticed that in latest patch for 2.4.0, the global Makefile
    > > no more tries to find a kgcc, and falls back to gcc.

    The global Makefile in 2.4.x -never- looked for kgcc.

    > > I suppose because is no more good for kernel, but still you
    > > can use 2.91, 2.95.2 or 2.96(??). Is that a patch that leaked in
    > > the way to test10, or is for another reason ?.
    > I've not yet submitted it to Linus is the obvious reason 8)

    You're not changing 2.4.x to use kgcc, are you? It seems to be working
    fine under gcc 2.95.2+fixes...


    Jeff Garzik | "Mind if I drive?" -Sam
    Building 1024 | "Not if you don't mind me clawing at the
    MandrakeSoft | dash and shrieking like a cheerleader."
    | -Max
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:10.205 / U:0.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site