lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
<snip>
> After the problems I experienced though, I wondered just how many
> problems would I be in for if I bought a brand new Athlon 800
> system? Would it run like a P100 due to lack of Linux hardware
> support? After reading stuff on lkml here, I'm starting to think
> that such an upgrade would be a waste of money until maybe 2.4.10
> or so.
>
> So the question is basically: Is the upgrade worthwhile? Is
> 2.2.x or 2.4.x compatible with Athlon CPU's or are there problems
> at all still? What about Athlon motherboards and chipset
> hardware? Can I expect the IDE chipset to work? Applying IDE
> patches is ok, but I just want to know that I'm going to get more
> than 10M/s out of the drives, and not fry them. Those are my
> main concerns, but I'd just like to know what the average
> developer thinks of the idea of forking out cash for a highend
> system right now and wether or not it is worth it yet.
>
> If not, I'd rather wait until things are integrated with the
> kernel proper and working. If it *IS* ready now, what sort of
> Athlon hardware is recommended for a developmental machine?

I have been using a Asus K7M motherboard for a while, and I have nothing
but positive things to say about athlons. Both Linux 2.2.x and 2.4test
works perfectly (in 2.2.x I can't get the IDE drives above UDMA33 mode,
but my IDE drives does only about 24-25mB/s anyhows so it's not really a
concern)

The IDE code fallbacks on PIO by default using this IDE chipset (VIA) in
2.2.x, but can be set to UDMA33 with the -X and -d option to hdparm.

My setup here at home is a Asus K7M mobo, 700Mhz Athlon, 512MB PC133 CAS 2
SDRAM, a Tekram 390U3W dual channel u160scsi card (guys - I need a 2.2.17
driver for this baby, LSI/Symbios 53C1010-33 chip), and a g400 max dual
head (which is by the way a great card for XFree use).

This motherboard is one of the first athlon-boards around, so it only runs
the RAM at 100Mhz, uses a slot A instead of the socket A, lacks the latest
chipset improvements and supports at most UDMA66. I can't speak of newer
athlon motherboards - because I havn't tested any else yet. This baby will
do for a while :-)

--
Andre Tomt
andre@tomt.net


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.115 / U:8.584 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site