[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, David Ford wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > a good idea to have SIGKILL delivery speeded up for every SIGKILL ...
> >
> > yep.
> How about SIGTERM a bit before SIGKILL then re-evaluate the OOM
> N usecs later?

And run the risk of having to kill /another/ process as well ?

I really don't know if that would be a wise thing to do
(but feel free to do some tests to see if your idea would
work ... I'd love to hear some test results with your idea).


"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.035 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site