[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler
    On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > > > so dns helper is killed first, then netscape. (my idea might not
    > > > make sense though.)
    > >
    > > It makes some sense, but I don't think OOM is something that
    > > occurs often enough to care about it /that/ much...
    > i'm trying to handle Andrea's case, the init=/bin/bash
    > manual-bootup case, with 4MB RAM and no swap, where the admin
    > tries to exec a 2MB process. I think it's a legitimate concern -
    > i cannot know in advance whether a freshly started process would
    > trigger an OOM or not.

    In that case the time running and the cpu time used
    factors should give the new process a heavy penalty
    compared to init.

    (but I'd be curious if somebody actually manages to
    trick the OOM killer into killing init ... please
    test a bit more to see if this really happens ;))


    "What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
    -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.024 / U:215.232 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site