Messages in this thread | | | From | richardj_moore@uk ... | Date | Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:40:52 +0100 | Subject | Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger |
| |
Yes, we looked at that and it didn't seem to provide the generality we needed - multipe exits registered per hook, ability to arm a set of hooks atomically, ability to prioritise dispatching order of a hook exit, MP complient. I may be wrong but the Linux Trace Toolkit hooks like like they were specifically designed to cater for inserting static tracepoints into the kernel.
Richard Moore - RAS Project Lead - Linux Technology Centre (PISC).
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux Office: (+44) (0)1962-817072, Mobile: (+44) (0)7768-298183 IBM UK Ltd, MP135 Galileo Centre, Hursley Park, Winchester, SO21 2JN, UK
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |