lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95?


    On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Larry McVoy wrote:

    > hand picked tests. No faster. Just compiles slower. Add to that
    > some distributions BRAINDEAD default of havving colorgcc be the default
    > compiler (can you say fork perl to fork gcc? Can you say STUPID?), and

    ITYM "cute". As in "cute dancing paperclip". As colourized ls. Or rm
    aliased to rm -i for root. Or 31337 cAp1tAl1z3d directory names in root.
    Or manpages in HTML (yes, today I had to touch Slowlaris too, why are
    you asking?) Or info crap verbose as "War and Peace" instead of manpages.
    Or --ignore-fail-on-non-empty as rmdir option. Or "let's replace config
    files with directories full of one-liners since packagers can't be arsed
    to learn sed(1)" religion. Sigh...

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:2.813 / U:0.300 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site