[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.2.18Pre Lan Performance Rocks!
    On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 01:36:32PM -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
    > On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > >Ummm, last I looked Linux held the Specweb99 record;
    > >by a wide margin...
    > ... but since then IBM/Zeus appear to have taken the lead:
    > But they were using a somewhat beefier machine - has anyone got Tux
    > SpecWeb99 figures for a 12 CPU, 64 GB, 12 NIC system?

    Good grief, what monster hardware...

    Those are (of course) system results which give some impression of
    how much users can pull out of the box.

    Trying to make them a bit more comparable, scaling the number with
    the number of processors:

    Zeus 12x600MHz IBM RS64-III 7288 SpecWEB99 ~ 607 SpecWEB99/CPU
    Zeus 4x375MHz IBM Power3-II 2175 SpecWEB99 ~ 544 SpecWEB99/CPU
    TUX 1.0 8x700MHz Pentium-III-Xeon 6387 SpecWEB99 ~ 798 SpecWeb99/CPU
    IIS 2x800MHz Pentium-III-Xeon 1060 SpecWEB99 ~ 530 SpecWEB99/CPU
    IIS 1x700MHz Pentium-III-Xeon 971 SpecWEB99 = 971 SpecWEB99/CPU

    Ok, more workers to do the thing, but each can achieve a bit less in
    the IBM/Zeus case than TUX 1.0. The smaller IBM/Zeus test case with
    older and slower processors yields almost as good results per CPU as
    the big one. CPU clock speed increase has been lost into inter-CPU
    collisions ? (that is, bad scaling)

    The IIS results are also interesting in their own. Single-CPU IIS
    yields impressive PER CPU result, but adding second CPU is apparently
    quite useless excercise. Hmm... Can't be.. As if that DUAL CPU
    result is actually run in single-CPU mode. The difference can
    directly be explained by the clock rate difference..
    (Surely the runners of that test *can't* make such an elementary

    To be able to compare apples and apples, I would like to see single,
    and dual CPU SpecWEB99 results with TUX. Then that apparent 20%
    better "per CPU result" of the single-CPU IIS could not be explained
    away with SMP inter-CPU communication overhead/collisions.

    > Paul

    /Matti Aarnio
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:3.052 / U:0.164 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site