[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: test10-pre7

On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > What would be wrong with just splitting it the other way, ie make OX_OBJS
> > be the expanded (but not ordered) list?
> >
> > That should take care of it, no?
> As an aside: remember you mentioned we should try to go 100% OX_OBJS
> anyway, eliminating O_OBJS completely...

The only problem is that those unfortunate people without tons of
CPU-power would get really fed up with the extra "made depend" overhead.

So as a less drastic step we should just make it more of a hint, and less
of a design that impacts the link-order..


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.101 / U:1.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site