Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:08:14 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: test10-pre7 |
| |
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > What would be wrong with just splitting it the other way, ie make OX_OBJS > > be the expanded (but not ordered) list? > > > > That should take care of it, no? > > As an aside: remember you mentioned we should try to go 100% OX_OBJS > anyway, eliminating O_OBJS completely...
The only problem is that those unfortunate people without tons of CPU-power would get really fed up with the extra "made depend" overhead.
So as a less drastic step we should just make it more of a hint, and less of a design that impacts the link-order..
Linus
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |