[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
Subject2.4.0test9pre9 - is it correct ?
I noticed the following change in the test9pre9 and doubt if it is
correct. Especially as Alan Cox rejected *identical* change for 2.2
arguing that in may break some architectures with non-byte based memory
addressing (especially ARM).

diff -uNr linux-test9pre8/drivers/net/3c505.c linux-test9pre9/drivers/net/3c505.c
--- linux-test9pre8/drivers/net/3c505.c Mon Oct 2 20:30:53 2000
+++ linux-test9pre9/drivers/net/3c505.c Tue Oct 3 15:35:22 2000
@@ -130,15 +130,15 @@
#define INVALID_PCB_MSG(len) \
printk(invalid_pcb_msg, (len),filename,__FUNCTION__,__LINE__)

-static char *search_msg __initdata = "%s: Looking for 3c505 adapter at address %#x...";
+static char search_msg[] __initdata = "%s: Looking for 3c505 adapter at address %#x...";

-static char *stilllooking_msg __initdata = "still looking...";
+static char stilllooking_msg[] __initdata = "still looking...";

Could anybody confirm whether the above patch is correct or errorneus ?

Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz
phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Technical University of Gdansk
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.042 / U:1.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site