Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:58:42 -0300 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.0-test9-pre8 |
| |
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Martin Diehl wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Martin Diehl wrote: > > > > > * deadlock in initscripts (even for runlevel 2). SysRq shows idle_task > > > being the only one ever getting the CPU when deadlocked. > > > > This suggests tasks yielding the CPU while task->state != > > TASK_RUNNABLE, which results in them never being rescheduled > > again ... > > Just tried 2.4.0-t9p8 + t9p8-vmpatch: No change here. Box > appears to hang upon "init 2" (or higher) when starting several > things (sendmail, xfs e.g.) with (according to SysRq+p) > idle_task being the only one R.
Now that I think of it ... this could be a new (old?) case of a UP-only bug. Is anybody seeing this upon booting their SMP system with 'mem=8m' ??
(if it is, I know what to look for and how to fix them)
regards,
Rik -- "What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!" -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |