lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.0-test9-pre8
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Martin Diehl wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Martin Diehl wrote:
> >
> > > * deadlock in initscripts (even for runlevel 2). SysRq shows idle_task
> > > being the only one ever getting the CPU when deadlocked.
> >
> > This suggests tasks yielding the CPU while task->state !=
> > TASK_RUNNABLE, which results in them never being rescheduled
> > again ...
>
> Just tried 2.4.0-t9p8 + t9p8-vmpatch: No change here. Box
> appears to hang upon "init 2" (or higher) when starting several
> things (sendmail, xfs e.g.) with (according to SysRq+p)
> idle_task being the only one R.

Now that I think of it ... this could be a new (old?) case
of a UP-only bug. Is anybody seeing this upon booting their
SMP system with 'mem=8m' ??

(if it is, I know what to look for and how to fix them)

regards,

Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.062 / U:6.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site