Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 28 Oct 2000 08:21:06 +0200 | From | Marko Macek <> | Subject | Re: kqueue microbenchmark resul |
| |
>In fact, if you did leave the read queued in a daemon using select() >before, you'd keep looping endlessly taking all CPU and never idle >because there would always be read data available.
Also, level triggered notifications would also seem to cause multiple thread wakeups and thundering herd problems when there are multiple worker threads reading from the same queue.
How does (?) kevent avoid this from happening?
Mark
-- ... recursive make suxx! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Marko.Macek@gmx.net
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |