[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRE: GPL Question
    On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, David Schwartz wrote:

    > > Now, if a module is loaded that registers a set of functions that have
    > > increased functionality compared to the original functions, if that
    > > modules is not based off GPL'd code, must the source code of that module
    > > be released under the GPL?
    > If the answer to this is "yes", then Microsoft should own some rights to
    > every piece of software that uses the Windows API.

    In fact, since you call the Windows API by linking against Windows
    libraries (kernel32.dll etc), Microsoft have as much right to dictate the
    licensing of Windows apps as the FSF has to require apps linked against
    GPLed code to be GPLed. (IMO, neither has any such right; of course, given
    the spate of recent laws we've seen, I wouldn't put any faith in a legal
    system to reach the "right" decision...)

    In this particular case - just communicating with GPLed code - the answer
    is no, you are not required to impose GPL restrictions on your users, you
    can use a free license instead (or a proprietary one, if you really


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:2.245 / U:1.192 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site