[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PATCH: killing read_ahead[]

On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> OTOH, block-dev readahead makes sense for filesystems where
> the packing locality is close to the access pattern BUT NOT
> close to anything the page cache would recognise as being
> close.

I dunno. The main reason I'd like to get the block devices into the page
cache is that right now there is no way to mmap them - something that can
potentially be _very_ useful, regardless of readahead.

And quite frankly, the generic file readahead has been pounded upon and
tested a lot more than the block device read-ahead ever was. I bet it
performs better if for no other reason.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.141 / U:1.996 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site