[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
From (Linus Torvalds)  wrote on 23.10.00 in <>:

> actually inform about the events. The way to do this simply is to limit it
> in very clear ways, the most notable one being simply that there is only
> one event queue per process (or rather, per "struct files_struct" - so
> threads would automatically share the event queue). This keeps the

While the rest looks fine, I suspect this one is a show-stopper.

IMO, the ability to wait for separate event sets in separate threads is a
MUST. In a single-threaded program, it would probably still be useful in a
number of situations.

Not that it's all that difficult to expand your model to do multiple

MfG Kai
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.250 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site