lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: kqueue microbenchmark results
Date

> Now, next time around the loop, we get a notification for an event
> when there is no data to read. The application now must be prepared
> to handle this case (meaning no blocking read() calls can be used).
> --
> Jonathan

If the programmer never wants to block in a read call, he should never do a
blocking read anyway. There's no standard that requires readability at time
X to imply readability at time X+1.

DS

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.133 / U:18.248 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site