[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] DProbes 1.1

On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 07:37:08PM +0530, wrote:
> For (a), your suggestion of a two pass approach is I guess feasible, but I
> wish there were a simpler way to do it.
> Actually I don't even really like the idea of forcing the swapped out page
> back in, which we are having to do right now - it would have been nicer
> if there were a swapin() routine in the vma ops that we could have used for
> on-demand probe insertion, just the way we use inode address space
> readpage() right now for discardable pages, but maybe that's asking for too
> much :-) [Could vma type based swapin() logic be a useful abstraction in
> general, aside from dprobes ?].

I think it would be. You could propose it on the linux-mm mailing list and
ask Linus what he thinks.

I agree that it would be much nicer to do it this way.

> We don't quite understand (b), though. There is indeed a race due to our
> not holding the page given to us by handle_mm_fault, while we try to access
> it, and we need to fix that of course, but that doesn't sound exactly like
> what you mention here. We do have handle_mm_fault being called under the mm
> semaphore. Could you explain the deadlock situation that you have in mind ?

It does not exist sorry. I was misremembering the lock hierarchy at that
place when I wrote the mail and should have double checked it.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.510 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site