lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [OT] Re: Possible C++ safe header project - Re:[Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules
** Reply to message from Stephen Satchell <spamfilter@fluent-access.com> on
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:54:46 -0700


> Linus has the final say, of course, but to suggest that any changes that
> remove name collisions between C and C++ be rejected out of hand has the
> potential for shooting ourselves in the foot. I'd rather do it slowly
> *now* instead of having to do it wholesale when the tools force us.

I agree. I think removed C++ reserved keywords from the header files should be
the FIRST priority, not the last. How many are there, anyway?

new
delete
virtual
class
operator

That's all I can think of now.



--
Timur Tabi - ttabi@interactivesi.com
Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com

When replying to a mailing-list message, please direct the reply to the mailing list only. Don't send another copy to me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.052 / U:59.668 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site