[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Topic for discussion: OS Design
David Woodhouse wrote:
> said:
> > The pc speaker is fine for playing one note at a time - it is
> > extremely shitty hardware if you want to play samples.
> It's actually quite reasonable for sound effects. Stuff like beeps and
> boings to announce talk requests, new mail, etc. But yes, playing mp3s on
> it does suck somewhat :)
> > A dirt cheap used soundcard or even a resistor network connected to the
> > parallel port is a good DAC-device compared to the pc speaker.
> Note that the latter is also supported by the PCSP driver, and has to play
> the same evil timer tricks. When I finally get round to shifting the system


> timer onto the RTC so the PCSP driver can have the 8253 all to itself,
> the PCSP driver will be a lot nicer. It doesn't impact the system
> performance that much at all.

Maybe I overestimated the overhead of the pc-speaker sound driver.
the quality is dubious due to the hardware. Some case designers fit the
cheapest possible speaker / piezo-electric device in order to
minimize cost. (It is only used for system beeps so why use something
expensive. Who
cares if there is scratching on a beep due to somthing located too near
the membrane...)

And don't even try asking a pc-case salesman about the quality of the
built-in speaker.

Helge Hafting
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.123 / U:5.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site