Messages in this thread |  | | Date | 23 Oct 2000 09:50:16 +0200 | From | "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <> | Subject | Re: Topic for discussion: OS Design |
| |
dlitz@dlitz.net (Dwayne C . Litzenberger) writes:
You contradict yourself:
[...]
> 3. Modules can very easily crash the whole kernel. This is because > each module does not get to run in its own protected memory space, as > it would i= n a well-designed microkernel.
[...]
> very elegant operating systems, namely the Amiga's exec.library and > QNX's Neutrino (I'm sure you can name others), used microkernels, and > they were b= oth *very* efficient. However, there are some drawbacks > to microkernels that h= ave
[...]
The AmigaOS (as I remember it from my past days) was fast because it had no memory protection between user and kernel space at all. So you could simply pass around message pointers without copying any data from kernel to user space.
Yeah. Cool. Fast. Crashed like hell all the time you made one false move.
Please, go and play with the other CS undergrads on Hurd. Or climb a tree.
Regards Henning
-- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.de
Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |