[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.4.0-testx fr0kedness?

I'll try this later. Is there any recourse if I have this
problem? ie: Recall or anything? Or should I just nab another
board? Different vender?

I like the BP6 but really don't HAVE to have one since I have 1 IDE device
and that.


Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA
Network Administrator - Toledo Internet Access - Toledo Ohio
- - - WHOIS JS10172
Version: 3.12 GE d-- s:+ a-- C++ UL+++ P--- L+++ E- W- N+ o-- K- w---
O M- V PS+ PE+++ Y+ PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv+ b+ DI+ D G e+ h! r++ y+

On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Jason Slagle wrote:
> > It worked fine under 2.3.x and as a matter of fact worked fine under
> > 2.4.0-test1-4 I believe.
> >
> > I don't buy a hardware explination when I've been running this setup for
> > well over a year and only just now have problems :)
> Well let me put some authority into his statement.
> Pull off your CASE.
> Enter the BIOS.
> Wave your hand and fingers over the surface of the mainboard.
> Watch your voltages move wildly.
> Now if they are stable and do not change +- 0.01 then you have a stable
> board. But 95%+ of the people have this problem on the second release of
> the BP6.
> FYI, EMF's change with age, as do the effect Z of the LRC circuits.
> Cheers,
> Andre Hedrick
> The Linux ATA/IDE guy

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.067 / U:2.688 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site