lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Eray Ozkural wrote:

> Let it remain C as you like it. I'm just telling that
>
> * you can't prevent people from writing C++ linux modules as they like
> * you are making unfair criticism of C++ language

Let me add one more point:

* you can't get the C++ advocates to write the stuff they
want to see in the kernel themselves

If C++ really is that good for kernel modules, I'd like to
see some code that proves it can be done without too much
of a performance hit (or without a performance hit at all?).

Sending 500 rants to the kernel list isn't even close to
being productive. Sending 1 patch is...

regards,

Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.202 / U:5.444 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site