[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: hdparm -d 1 fail test9-pre8
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> In order for hdparm -d 1 to work in test9-pre8, I had to reverse
> this change. (Without being able to enable dma, performance here
> is muy el-stinko;-) Is enabling dma manually now forbidden? (or
> am I maybe missing something else?)

If this change broke your DMA enabling, I think there are other bugs
lurking in the code...

Can you provide a "diff -u " of dmesg, output, with, and without the
change below?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.287 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site