Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:43:41 -0700 (PDT) | From | Andre Hedrick <> | Subject | Re: hdparm -d 1 fail test9-pre8 |
| |
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
I know that you are still pissed at me but do not do end runs around me. That is not cool, and you do not know where things are going.
Heck, I keep changing my mind on stuff as I design it.
I would be more appreciative if you at least sent it to me since I am the one that has to clean up issues that I do not get to see.
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > In order for hdparm -d 1 to work in test9-pre8, I had to reverse > > this change. (Without being able to enable dma, performance here > > is muy el-stinko;-) Is enabling dma manually now forbidden? (or > > am I maybe missing something else?) > > If this change broke your DMA enabling, I think there are other bugs > lurking in the code...
No you disable the enable of the device and it kicked out to legacy mode.
> Can you provide a "diff -u " of dmesg, output, with, and without the > change below? > > Jeff > > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
Andre Hedrick The Linux ATA/IDE guy
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |