Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: 32-bit pid_t / security | Date | Mon, 2 Oct 2000 11:27:16 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> If you read my entire post, rather than just the part that you quoted, > you'll see that I argue FOR, not against, a larger pid_t, based on just > these grounds; I know that sooner or later, we'll need those extra > processes. Well, my 486 won't...
S/390 folks run 70,000 sessions active within the same 60 second period off one big box. Not on Linux (yet ;)) but its worth bearing in mind.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |