[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: A patch to loop.c for better cryption support
Ingo Rohloff  wrote:
>> There is a paper about why it is a bad idea to use
>> sequence numbers for CBC IV's. I just have to find the reference to it.
>Does this mean sequence as in 0,1,2,3,4 ... or does this mean
>any pre-calculate-able sequence ? In the former case we might just use
>a simple one way hash-function over the requested sector number.

It just means that 0,1,2,3,... is bad. Using SHA1(sector #) should be ok.

But do think carefully about what happens when you modify a sector!!
In particular, will you be re-using the old IV when you write the new
data? That could be problematic.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.144 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site