[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Patch to remove undefined C code
Jonathan George <> writes:

> This patch has many bogus corrections where new variables were created, but
> the order of evaluation is already unambiguous.
> For example each comma separated clause in an expression is guaranteed to be
> completely evaluated before the next comma separated clause Including
> Assignments.

No, that is not true in general. When the comma in question is
the comma operator, it is true. But when the comma separates
arguments to a function, it is not: the order of evaluation of
function arguments is implementation dependent. See C89 section "Function calls":

$ The order of evaluation of the function designator, the
$ arguments, and subexpressions within the arguments is
$ unspecified, ...
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil."
--D. E. Knuth, "Structured Programming with go to Statements"
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.065 / U:2.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site