Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI | Date | Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:41:05 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> I don't think I understand your point. Are you saying that gcc cannot be > expected to keep up with the ways in which the kernel uses it? My argument > is that providing a compiler that actually regresses (old version compiles > kernel, redhat 7.0 included one does not) is not a good choice.
The bugs are as far as I can tell in the kernel sources not in gcc. The code optimising has improved and that gets us little suprises.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |