Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Chris Swiedler" <> | Subject | RE: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 | Date | Wed, 11 Oct 2000 14:47:35 -0400 |
| |
> > 2.2.18pre15 defines udelay as (in file include/asm-i386/delay.h) : > > extern void __bad_udelay(void); > > > > #define udelay(n) (__builtin_constant_p(n) ? \ > > ((n) > 20000 ? __bad_udelay() : __const_udelay((n) * > > 0x10c6ul)) : \ > > __udelay(n)) > > > > ... > > It seems __bad_udelay is not defined anywhere in the kernel source. > > Correct. Its a compile time error trap
Wouldn't it be better to use an #error directive? I'm sure this could turn into a FAQ, even though the symbol is called "__bad_udelay()".
chris
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |