[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI
   Date: 	Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:15:24 -0600
From: Cort Dougan <>

It's not a new idea but that doesn't make it a good one. The idea
of distributing the _same_ compiler but different versions is

Actually, this is common practice even in the commercial UNIX world
for kernel development. I have seen several UNIX vendors who use a
specific version of a specific compiler for kernel development. When
you want to build a kernel, you check out the kernel build kit, and
this is the compiler that gets used.

I honestly see nothing wrong with it. There are different parts of
the compiler stressed by the kernel build as opposed to most userland
compilation, and furthermore the desired compiler stability/feature
ratio is different for each task. So one way to solve these differing
needs is to simply use different compilers.

David S. Miller
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.051 / U:34.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site