Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Oct 2000 21:46:57 +0200 | Subject | Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 | From | Andreas Schwab <> |
| |
"Chris Swiedler" <ceswiedler_lk@mindspring.com> writes:
|> > > 2.2.18pre15 defines udelay as (in file include/asm-i386/delay.h) : |> > > extern void __bad_udelay(void); |> > > |> > > #define udelay(n) (__builtin_constant_p(n) ? \ |> > > ((n) > 20000 ? __bad_udelay() : __const_udelay((n) * |> > > 0x10c6ul)) : \ |> > > __udelay(n)) |> > > |> > > ... |> > > It seems __bad_udelay is not defined anywhere in the kernel source. |> > |> > Correct. Its a compile time error trap |> |> Wouldn't it be better to use an #error directive?
There is no way to test the condition in the preprocessor.
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab "And now for something SuSE Labs completely different." Andreas.Schwab@suse.de SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |