Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:24:14 -0300 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: test10-pre1 problems on 4-way SuperServer8050 |
| |
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Mark Hemment wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > > > > > a) one of the eepro100 interfaces (the onboard one on the S2QR6 mb) is > > > malfunctioning, interrupts are generated but no traffic gets through (YES, > > > I did plug it in correctly, this time, and I repeat 2.2.16 works!) > > > > I saw this the other week on our two-way Dell under a reasonibly heavy > > load - but with 3c59x.c driver, the eepro100s survived! > > Either NIC (had two Tornados) could go this away after anything from 1 > > to 36 hours of load. They would end up running in "poll" mode off the > > transmit watchdog timer. > > Swapped them for a dual-port eepro100 and no more problems. > > I disabled eepro100 support completely and the problem is still > there. What I also noticed is that with highmem-PAE enabled I > get BUG in page_alloc.c at line 221 so it is probably a VM > problem recently introduced (hence cc'd Rik).
Can you trigger this bug /without/ PAE ?
I've been stress-testing my dual-cpu test machines (one with 64MB and one with 1GB ram) very very heavily for the last 4 days and haven't encountered any bug whatsoever ...
Btw, what compiler are you using ?
> I will continue to narrow down by removing some things (like > mtrr) from the equation. Rik, the problem is that when one > enables PAE (or just highmem-4G) support on a 4-way 6G RAM > machine becomes 38-40 times slower.
38-40 times slower in what kind of benchmark ?
regards,
Rik -- "What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!" -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |