lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15
From
Date
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br> writes:

> 2.2.18pre15 defines udelay as (in file include/asm-i386/delay.h) :
>
> ...
>
> extern void __bad_udelay(void);
>
> ...
>
> #define udelay(n) (__builtin_constant_p(n) ? \
> ((n) > 20000 ? __bad_udelay() : __const_udelay((n) *
> 0x10c6ul)) : \
> __udelay(n))
>
> ...
>
>
> It seems __bad_udelay is not defined anywhere in the kernel source.

Which is the whole point - you wouldn't want to call a bad function,
would you? If you reference __bad_udelay() you are doing something
wrong and should be using mdelay() instead.

//Marcus
--
-------------------------------+------------------------------------
Marcus Sundberg | http://www.stacken.kth.se/~mackan
Royal Institute of Technology | Phone: +46 707 452062
Stockholm, Sweden | E-Mail: mackan@stacken.kth.se
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.097 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site