[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Incorrect UDMA timing on VIA vt82c596b
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:43:33AM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:

> Also I need to adjust the rules for "ignore byte93" because the the
> various methods that are being supported.

Yes, it would be nice if we had some better guesses on whether to think
the 80-wire cable is present. It would also be nice if the ide0=ata66
implied ignoring the byte93 data as well as the controller data, instead
of having two options for that.

Btw, reading the ATA/ATAPI-6 specs I think UDMA66 should work on a
setup where would be just one drive and a really short, 40-wire cable
without problems as well. I've even seen systems shipped like that.

Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.098 / U:1.512 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site