Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 2 Oct 2000 00:20:25 +0200 (CEST) | From | Igmar Palsenberg <> | Subject | Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? |
| |
> > They released a supported ex-Cygnus people approved compiler. > > Which still makes it an broken, experimental, unreleased and unofficial > compiler, with all the consequences I said.
If you really want broken and expirimental stuff go work for M$ or so.
> > to flame SuSE, Conectiva, and especially Mandrake as well - all of them made > > up of hardworking people trying to do what they think is best for Linux. I > > Indeed. So why does redhat so a remarkably *bad* job at the same? SuSE for > example did *not* make their distribution incompatible to all others to > try to tie customers to them.
So everybody their own distribution. I think SuSE sucks, it's overbloated, the apps are way to old on it, and the installer sucks.
But that doesn't mean I would say 'Do't use SuSE, it's bad.' I last looked at a version 2 years ago, so things have changed.
> Well, if redhat really tried to do this they failed miserably. OTOH, maybe > the redhat people doing that were drugged, because every child could > deduce that using an experimental snapshot that is has a non-fixed and > changing ABI will not help binary compatibility. > > > Let me metion the Nazi's. Now can the thread die ? > > Aren't you paid by redhat? ;->
Let this thread die. Now.
Igmar
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |