lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Disk priorities...
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 03:58:55PM -0700, LA Walsh <law@sgi.com> wrote:
> Specifically, I'm talking about 'nice'd "down" processes -- things

Well, it is difficult to implement (network bandwidht limiting or i/o
latency for example), but asking for it once a year might make it reality.

OS2 had a lot of these things in their scheduler, but, according to
subjective reports from a lot of people, it didn't seem to work very well
(it slowed downt he scheduler considerably without ever working great).

--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@opengroup.org |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.046 / U:1.736 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site