Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 01 Oct 2000 15:34:17 +0200 | From | Martin Dalecki <> | Subject | Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? |
| |
Alan Cox wrote: > > > > They released a supported ex-Cygnus people approved compiler. > > > > Which still makes it an broken, experimental, unreleased and unofficial > > compiler, with all the consequences I said. > > And didnt you write something called pgcc once.
And then there isn't anything I could see which would prohibit anybody from taking gcc-2.96 and ship it in any distro they wish too. Alan you are in full right here the gcc-2.96 DOES a significantly *better* job on in esp. C++ for example then any other gcc before - at least on the arch's which really matter those days. The PGCC never really worked. In fact on TeX at least it generated worder code then the plain gcc-2.7.3 those day's.... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |