lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Disk priorities...
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, LA Walsh wrote:

> Forgive me if this has been asked before, but has there ever
> been any thought of having a 'nice' value for disk accesses?.

Not currently, but it would be trivial to adjust the maximum
elevator sorting latency according to the niceness of the
process. I have no idea how much this would help, though ...

> I've also thought before a simple 'netnice' would be good as
> well -- real nice and easy to use, lets see:
> netnice
> disknice
> cpunice
> nice <number>| -p <cpunice> , -d <disknice>, -n <netnice, -a <all nice>

That would be nice indeed.
(send patches! ;))

regards,

Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.080 / U:1.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site