Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Ernesto Vargas" <> | Subject | RE: Soft-Updates for Linux ? | Date | Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:50:10 -0400 |
| |
What of those journalled file systems are more prominent to success 2.5.
-----Original Message----- From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Alan Cox Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 11:28 AM To: Robert Redelmeier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Soft-Updates for Linux ?
> I'm wondering if there are any plans to bring Kirk McKusick's "Soft-Updates" > to Linux in 2.5 ??? Kirk has recently modified his licence (friendlier). > I could only find some noncomittal postings on LKML from 1997.
I think everyone is planning to go the whole way - that is to use full journalled file systems - reiserfs, ext3, xfs, jffs, ibm jfs, .. whatever
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |