Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:33:56 +0000 | From | Jamie Lokier <> | Subject | Re: Memory detection is still broken in 2.3.36 |
| |
nathan.zook@amd.com wrote: > I've dropped Linus off the direct list. I think we should be able to debug > this one w/o his help. ;-) > > Lines 594-606 of setup.c, which is the old section cause problems with > 0-length regions, now properly handles them. This must be some new problem. > > Could we have the e820 data out of /var/log/dmesg? head should work.
Jan 6 05:03:56 thefinal kernel: e820: 0009fc00 @ 00000000 (usable) Jan 6 05:03:56 thefinal kernel: e820: 00000400 @ 0009fc00 (reserved) Jan 6 05:03:56 thefinal kernel: e820: 00004000 @ 000e8000 (usable) Jan 6 05:03:56 thefinal kernel: e820: 00010000 @ 000f0000 (reserved) Jan 6 05:03:56 thefinal kernel: e820: 03ee0000 @ 00100000 (usable) Jan 6 05:03:56 thefinal kernel: e820: 00010000 @ 03fe0000 (ACPI data) Jan 6 05:03:56 thefinal kernel: e820: 00010000 @ 03ff0000 (reserved) Jan 6 05:03:56 thefinal kernel: e820: 00016e00 @ 100a0000 (reserved) Jan 6 05:03:56 thefinal kernel: e820: 00000200 @ 100b6e00 (ACPI NVS) Jan 6 05:03:56 thefinal kernel: e820: 00049000 @ 100b7000 (reserved) Jan 6 05:03:56 thefinal kernel: e820: 00080000 @ fff80000 (reserved)
The map looks plausible to me. How do I tell which page ranges the kernel is using for memory allocation?
-- Jamie
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |