Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 29 Jan 2000 15:16:53 -0800 | From | Chip Salzenberg <> | Subject | Re: autofs v4, nfs v3, 2.2.15 ? |
| |
According to Alan Cox: > Chip: > > Trond's NFS client patches include both v2 improvements and v3. Would > > it be OK to leave in v3 if it were marked experimental? > > You have a lot more chance of convincing me if you can show the v2 changes > standing alone work well, then later add the v3 stuff in such a way that > it is obvious that the path is taken only if v3 is selected.
Well, CONFIG_FS_NFS_V3 is separate from CONFIG_FS_NFS. Is that good enough? -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <chip@valinux.com> "He's Mr. Big of 'Big And Tall' fame." // MST3K
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |