lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM
    Date
    From
    "Davide Libenzi" <davidel@maticad.it> said:

    [...]

    > I need the same things You need, I'd like if this patch will be tested to
    > discover :

    > 1) Performance loss ( if any ) under low wordload
    > 2) Performance gain ( if any ) under high wordload

    As has been stated convincingly here (for me, at least) very high load
    means a runqueue of at the very most 10, ridiculous overload gives some
    30. So your scheduler (using your own measurements!) hurts performance
    except for ridiculous overload (and contrieved benchmarks). Those aren't
    the cases I want Linux to be optimized for.
    --
    Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl
    Casilla 9G, Viña del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:2.266 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site