Messages in this thread | | | From | "Davide Libenzi" <> | Subject | Re: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM | Date | Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:51:49 +0100 |
| |
Hi Horst,
> I'd like to see hard numbers of _real_ workloads that'd allow me to relate > your benchamrk numbers to reality. I'm not too worried about a few percent > increase in schedule() time on a mostly idle personal machine, I'm worried > about that few percent on a loaded machine (10 or so tasks around here, > usually) that is _far_ from your hundreds of running tasks scenarios.
I need the same things You need, I'd like if this patch will be tested to discover :
1) Performance loss ( if any ) under low wordload 2) Performance gain ( if any ) under high wordload
I don't have testing suites ( other than mine ) and hardware to do this, so I'd like if someone will give the patch a real test.
Cheers, Davide.
-- All this stuff is IMVHO
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |