Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Tue, 11 Jan 2000 22:54:41 +0200 (EET) | From | Taneli Vähäkangas <> | Subject | Re: i2o_core.c question |
| |
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Tim Waugh wrote:
> In i2o_activate_controller, what's up with this? Is it a typo, or is it > supposed to be like that? It's at line 1490. (It _looks_ like a typo, > but..) > > if(i2o_init_outbound_q(c)); > I2O_REPLY_WRITE32(c,virt_to_phys(msg)); > > Tim. > */
We already fixed this in 2.3.39, i2o_sys_init clean-ups thanks to Auvo.
BTW, we'd like to know if there are people actually _using_ the i2o stuff, especially the lan part. It isn't quite ready yet, but if you have extra i2o hardware lying around (yeah, most probable), could you please give it a whirl? Oh, btw, it blows up quite nicely on smp ... and you need something like this:
***snip*** --- i2o_core.c-000111 Tue Jan 11 13:30:01 2000 +++ i2o_core.c Tue Jan 11 19:19:56 2000 @@ -2463,7 +2466,7 @@ #endif if(i2o_num_controllers) - i2o_init(); + i2o_sys_init(); i2o_config_init(); #ifdef CONFIG_I2O_BLOCK ***snip*** to even try it non-modular.
Taneli <taneli@firmament.fi>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |