Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Sep 1999 05:49:35 -0500 (CDT) | From | Chris Smith <> | Subject | Re: Shortening the Development Cycle... |
| |
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Robert Dinse wrote: > It would limit participation in development to those that can afford the > latest and greatest hardware, significantly reducing the pool of coders, and > as a result increase the length of the development cycle.
That doesn't make a lot of sense... what "M. Carling" asked was that support for new hardware not be included in stable kernel sets... that doesn't implu removinf old hardware support from development kernel sets. If I'm missing something, let me know what it is.
I'm not sure that limiting stable kernels that much is a good idea, but this is definitely not the right argument against it.
Chris
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |