Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:26:17 +0200 (CEST) | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: [patch] longstanding chksum patch |
| |
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999 mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu wrote:
>also some months ago somebody (who happened to be the implementor of that >unrolled 686 loop) pointed out that the 128-byte unrolling is suboptimal >as well.
My machine was faster with the 128-byte unrolled loop.
Andrea
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |