Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Amanda VFAT Incremental Backups Broken in linux-2.2.1[12] | Date | Sun, 5 Sep 1999 21:58:12 +0100 | From | list.kernel@iahastie ... |
| |
In article <14289.24535.746859.283844@server.goodbit.net>, Martin Gallant <martyg@goodbit.net> writes >Guys, thanks for all the replies. I am the original poster in this >thread. >Interesting discussion. >[snip] > >So the question is, what changed in VFAT support from 2.2.10->2.2.11? >Is there some magic switch I can use to revert to legacy behavior? >
Well. I had a quick browse through patch-2.2.11 to look at the vfat changes, and it seems Al gave Vfat a big revision here with his constant i-numbers update.
However I couldn't see obvious change in the [acm]time handling, certainly the bits it vfat_fill_inode() look identical except for variable naming.
Have you looked at the [acm]time(s) on your vfat partitions to see what exactly is going wrong/ is different from before. P'haps that can help narrow the suspect handling down. (Assuming the change was unintentional).
TTFN (It's been a long day - so I might give vfat another lookover when I'm truly awake, in case I've missed a blatant & obvious) -- Roger Gammans "If I have trouble installing Linux, something is wrong. Very wrong." -- Linus Torvalds
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |