lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Amanda VFAT Incremental Backups Broken in linux-2.2.1[12]
Date
From
In article <14289.24535.746859.283844@server.goodbit.net>, Martin
Gallant <martyg@goodbit.net> writes
>Guys, thanks for all the replies. I am the original poster in this
>thread.
>Interesting discussion.
>[snip]
>
>So the question is, what changed in VFAT support from 2.2.10->2.2.11?
>Is there some magic switch I can use to revert to legacy behavior?
>

Well. I had a quick browse through patch-2.2.11 to look at the vfat
changes, and it seems Al gave Vfat a big revision here with his constant
i-numbers update.

However I couldn't see obvious change in the [acm]time handling,
certainly the bits it vfat_fill_inode() look identical except for
variable naming.

Have you looked at the [acm]time(s) on your vfat partitions to see what
exactly is going wrong/ is different from before.
P'haps that can help narrow the suspect handling down. (Assuming the
change was unintentional).

TTFN (It's been a long day - so I might give vfat another lookover
when I'm truly awake, in case I've missed a blatant & obvious)
--
Roger Gammans
"If I have trouble installing Linux, something is wrong. Very wrong."
-- Linus Torvalds

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.045 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site