lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: v2.3.17pre1 - Patches, Complaints, Questions and Jubilations
Date
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) writes:
> > > >+ /* Suppress compiler warning. See EI_SHIFT in 8390.h for details */
> > > >+ (void)ei_local;
> > > Or use __attribute__ ((__unused__)) on the declaration.
> > Even better, just wrap the definition with #ifndef __i386__
>
> All of which just looks ugly. So I leave it as is

Merely pimples on the great pustulating boil.

It is far from obvious (proven empirically) that E8390_CMD (et al)
use EI_SHIFT, which in turn _may_ require that "ei_local->reg_offset[]"
to be valid in the current scope.

IMHO.

--
`O O' | Home: Nick.Holloway@alfie.demon.co.uk http://www.alfie.demon.co.uk/
// ^ \\ | Work: Nick.Holloway@parallax.co.uk

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.037 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site